Celestion CDX1-1447 Compression Driver with H1-7050 “No Bell” Horn

November 1 2017, 14:00
This Test Bench samples came from UK pro sound OEM Celestion. I received the new CDX1-1447 1” ferrite motor compression driver coupled with Celestion’s also recently released H1-7050 ‘No Bell’ 70° × 50° horn (see Photo 1). The CDX1-1447 compression driver is the latest in Celestion’s series of 1” ferrite motor with 1.4” diameter voice coil compression drivers. This includes the CDX1-1446, the CDX1-1445, and the CDX1-1440, and in terms of power handling, it is the highest rated of the group. Features for the CDX1-1447 include a one piece polyimide diaphragm and surround, with an exit (throat) diameter of 25.4 mm (1.0”). The polyimide diaphragm is coupled to a 35 mm (1.4”) diameter voice coil wound with copper-clad aluminum wire (CCAW). Other features include an injection-molded body, a 35 WRMS AES-rated power handling (70 W maximum), a minimum crossover of 2.2 kHz (using a second-order network), a ferrite ring magnet motor, and solderable terminals. As with all Celestion’s compression drivers, the CDX1-1447 was designed using FEA CAD software to optimize both the magnetic and the acoustic systems.
 
Photo 1: Celestion’s CDX1-1447 compression driver and H1-7050 “No Bell” horn.
Photo 2: Close-up view of the H1-7050 “No Bell” horn showing the horizontal elastomer damping inserts.

The horn supplied with the CDX1-1447 was a new and rather innovative design. The H1-7050 “No Bell” is a cast-aluminum exponential flare-type horn with a 70° × 50° radiation pattern. The “No Bell” part refers to the general bell ringing character of cast-aluminum horns when you “ping” them with your finger. In order to dampen this parasitic ringing, Celestion has cut out (well, molded out) a horizontal section on either side of the 1” exit and filled it with elastomer side panels (see Photo 2) to make the horn more acoustically inert. (I used to spray foam on the back sides of horns in the 1980s to accomplish the same objective!) After giving the H1-7050 the traditional “ping” test, I found the elastomer panels function quite effectively.

I commenced testing on the CDX1-1447/H1-7050 using the LinearX LMS analyzer to produce the 200-point stepped sine wave impedance plot shown in Figure 1. The solid black curve is the response with the CDX1-1447 mounted on the H1-7050 horn and the dashed blue curve shows the compression driver’s response curve without the horn. With a 6.28 Ω DCR, the minimum impedance of the CDX1-1447/H1-7050 was 7.59 Ω and at 3.88 kHz.

Next, I mounted the CDX1-1447/H1-7050 without an enclosure in free air then measured both the horizontal and vertical on and off axis at 2.83 V/1 m using a 100-point gated sine wave sweep. Figure 2 shows the on-axis of the compression driver/horn combination for the CDX1-1447. The response is approximately ±2 dB from the minimum recommended crossover frequency of 2.2 kHz to 10 kHz, with a declining response above 14 kHz where the low-pass roll-off begins.
 
Figure 1: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 free-air impedance plot.
Figure 2: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 on-axis frequency response.
Figure 3: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 horizontal on and off-axis frequency response (0° = solid; 15° = dot; 30° = dash; 45° = dash/dot; 60° = dash).
Figure 4: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 vertical on- and off-axis frequency response (0° = solid; 15° = dot; 30° = dash; 45° = dash/dot; 60° = dash).
Figure 5: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 normalized horizontal on- and off-axis frequency response (0° = solid; 15° = dot; 30° = dash; 45° = dash/dot; 60° = dash).
Figure 6: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 normalized vertical on- and off-axis frequency response (0° = solid; 15° = dot; 30° = dash; 45° = dash/dot; 60° = dash).

With the H1-7050 horn’s coverage pattern at 70°H × 50°V, you would expect some directivity difference in the horizontal and vertical off-axis plots, which is true as seen in Figure 3 for the horizontal orientation and in Figure 4 for the vertical orientation. Plots with the off axis normalized to the on-axis response for the horizontal and vertical axis measurements are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.

The CLIO Pocket analyzer polar plots (in 10° increments) are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. Figure 9 gives the two-sample SPL comparison of the CDX1-1447/H1-7050, showing both samples to be closely matched within 0.5 to 1 dB.
 
Figure 7: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 horizontal CLIO polar plot.
Figure 8: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 vertical CLIO polar plot.
Figure 9: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 two-sample SPL comparison.

For the remaining tests, I employed the Listen AmpConnect ISC analyzer and 0.25” SCM microphone, using SoundCheck 14 software to measure distortion and generate time-frequency plots. For the distortion measurement, I mounted the CDX1-1447/H1-7050 combination in free air sans baffle and used a pink noise stimulus to set the SPL to 104 dB at 1 m (2.68 V). I measured the distortion with the Listen microphone placed 10 cm from the mouth of the horn. Figure 10 shows the distortion curves. I then used SoundCheck to get a 2.83 V/1 m impulse response and imported the data into Listen’s SoundMap Time/Frequency software. Figure 11 shows the resulting CSD waterfall plot. Figure 12 shows the STFT plot. 

The CDX1-1447 is a solid performer with the usual excellent build quality that Celestion always delivers. As far as the H1-7050 horn goes, I certainly applaud any effort to suppress parasitic ringing in horns, so this is definitely innovative. However, this is probably more appreciated when the H1-7050 is used in a studio monitor application, as I suspect any ringing would get buried in the mix when it is used in a PA situation. For more information, visit celestion.com. VC
 
Figure 10: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 SoundCheck distortion plots.
Figure 11: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 SoundCheck CSD waterfall plot.
Figure 12: Celestion CDX1-1447/H1-7050 SoundCheck STFT plot.

This article was originally published in Voice Coil, March 2017.
Page description
About Vance Dickason
Vance Dickason has been working as a professional in the loudspeaker industry since 1974. A contributing editor to Speaker Builder magazine (now audioXpress) since 1986, in November 1987 he became editor of Voice Coil, the monthly Periodical for the Loudspeake... Read more

related items